The Mac Pro, by some performance benchmarks, is the most powerful computer that Apple offers.To help people work out which Macs work best with Final Cut Pro X, it is useful to refer to a standard speed test.All but one of the MacBook Pros with Retina configurations do not have dedicated GPUs. I got the 8-core with 16gigs or ram and the upgraded Radeon graphics card.Mac Pro is a series of workstations and servers for professionals that are designed, developed and marketed by Apple Inc. When I bough the computer in 2009 it was pretty impressive. BruceX: Try this new Final Cut Pro X benchmarkDouble-wide, 16-lane PCI Express 2.0 graphics slot with one of the following graphics cards installed: ATI Radeon HD 5770 with 1GB of GDDR5 memory.The film started on a G4 with FC6, than migrated to a early model Mac Pro with FC7 at a university editing room and then finally moving to my newly purchased 2009 Mac Pro to finish the film. 'The ATI Radeon HD 5800-series AMD confirmed as the undisputed leader in visual computing technology,' said Rick Bergman, Senior Vice President and General. The new editions have already been officially approved by the Board for a number of partners and two new cards, Radeon HD 5770 and Radeon HD 5750, both aimed at the traditional market.It creates a very short timeline at a high resolution: 5120 by 2700 (at 23.975 fps). This test puts enough pressure on main memory and GPU memory to separate older generation Macs from more recent computers.Over at the the FCP.co forum, qbe asked me to do the ‘Far Far Away’ test on my new late 2013 MacBook Pro 15″ using only the built-in Iris Pro Graphics and also on only the Discrete GeForce GT 750M GPU which I included in my BTO Mac.It turns out that the test wasn’t tough enough to show a difference between the two GPUs:MacBook Pro late-2013 Discrete GeForce GT 750M 2GB 18.8 secondsMacBook Pro late-2013 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 1GB 19.2 secondsI’ve come up with a test that shows the differences between these GPUs and other Macs… The BruceX benchmarkBruceX is a small Final Cut Pro X XML file that you import into Final Cut Pro. The Intel Iris and Iris Pro are every bit the match or master of discrete NVIDIA Mobile GPUs — at least when it comes to OpenCL acceleration.Although it is great news that integrated GPUs are getting better, many are worried that the MacBook Pros should be avoided until Iris Pro has improved a little more.A speed test proposed by FCP.co was to time the render of Final Cut Pro X’s built-in ‘Far Far Away’ title on a 23.975 1080p timeline. Take a look at a new post at Bare Feats:In the past we sneered at the integrated GPUs and their puny performance. Editors want to know if the integrated Intel Iris and Iris Pro Graphics GPUs are powerful enough to run professional software well.Early testing shows that Iris Pro graphics are better than many expected.
Dual Ati Radeon 5770 Card Pro Final Cut Mac Pro Is![]() From the ‘When Done’ pop-up menu, choose ‘Open With QuickTime Player’9. In the ‘Video Codec’ section choose a flavour of ‘ProRes’8. In the dialogue box that appears, click the ‘Settings’ Tab7. This reason is, by my opinion, also hindering Iris Pro in this particular instance, as the test is really complex for GPU and as shown in Anandtech test, when Iris Pro is set on higher detail or resolutions (in games, DirectX or OpenGL, but i assume behaviour should be same in OpenCL), it starts slow down rather fast due to low amount of VRAM (or the whole igpu shared ram system to make things worse)As there are no other test except one very easy and one very complex, i assume that for basic stuff with FCP-X Iris Pro is sufficient, but for heavy lifting or other apps nvidia 750m is actually very handy.I only assume though, but will wait for more tests (barefeats), as i would love one of the new machines, but I need it only for easy stuff in FCPX, i have desktop for all the heavy lifting. Hack with 660Ti took really long, acording to specs it should be way more powerful than 750m, but that is a hack and i for one know, cannot take it as general rule/basis without broader specimens.The second instance worth noting is performance of previous rMBP (early 2012), 750m should be only little faster than 660m, the big difference here is amount of VRAM. Your configuration’s BruceX Score is the average export time in seconds. Before timing the next export, restart Final Cut (otherwise the exports speed up each time because X does a little caching renders to save time).These results include those posted at the FCP.co Forum and from BareFeats.com.The results show that BruceX tests processor power, but also shows that Iris Pro Graphics has some way to go to match a discrete graphics GPU in the new MacBook Pro 15″ with RetinaMacBook Pro late-2013 2.6 Ghz Quad Core i7( To choose which GPU to use for the test on my MacBook Pro, I used gfxCardStatus by Cody Krieger – a Shareware app downloaded from gfx.io )From results two instances are noted. If possible do the export at least three times. Get your stopwatch ready and time from when you click ‘Save’ until you see the movie open up in QuickTime Player.12. In the Save sheet, choose a name and location for the export – export to your fastest drive connected using your fastest connection.11. Microsoft office for mac acivation email addressSo rendered BruceX in Prores 422Mac Pro took 19.7 seconds from start to opening in QT. LuxMark on the other hand scales much better:But I guess that’ll change with OSX 10.9.1 and FCPX 10.1 with support for the new mac pro.So rendering H.264 failed to export Error 12348. Especially with enabled Intel HD everything is bottlenecked by the internal graphics (at least on my Hackintosh). ![]() Hummm estimated size 123 GB. Redering master file uncompressed at 10 bit. With the same file sizeThis is fun another test. 83% okay iMac took 6 mins. File size 14.47gb iMac is still rendering …. So I removed the R17 transistor and boom!So it seems that PCIE speed is really important for FCPX with powerful GPUs.I also did a test with Luxmark (default scene): with 2,5 GT/s the result was 1750 and when activating the PCIE 2.0 mode the result was a bit higher: 1860. I think that Apple is doing some “tweaking” in FCPX to make it run faster on nVidia GPUs integrated in their iMacs and MacBook Pro Retina.Gigabyte Radeon 7950 3gb flashed for boot screens (a bit overlocked by default, as the GPU is running at 900 mhz instead of 800 mhz):Second run after flashing the card: 75 seconds!!!!I did not find an answer until I realized that once flashed, the GPU is working at 2,5 GT/s (That´s PCIE 1.0). Must be the GTX 660 that has official nVidia clocks):A little disappointing: some nVidia cards less powerful than this one (GT 650m, GT 750m, GT 755m, etc).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCarson ArchivesCategories |